Why You Should Take a Pay Cut to Telecommute

An IDG peer of mine recently wrote an article proclaiming that workers WHO are willing to take a pay cut in exchange for working from home induce not to the full considered the impact of that trade-bump off. If you finish to do the mathematics, though, a sane salary cut is actually more like a heave when you're working from home.

In the article, Meredith Levinson talks or so a variety of recent surveys correlate to teleworking. A FINS.com informal online poll establish 92 pct of respondents would accept a dream job that requires them to bring on from home. A survey from the tech careers site Cube.com reported that more than a third of Information technology workers are uncoerced to take over to a 10 pct pay cut to telecommute. Finally, she also notes that many of the comments on Slashdot related to the Cube.com follow agree that a pay cut is reasonable.

Online Collaboration — Working from home is a win-win for the employer and the employee.

Levinson doesn't agree, though. In fact, given the many benefits for the employer, she feels that a pay wage increase is in order to workers who telecommute. I understand her point, and I agree. In fact, I wrote an article at the first of this year explaining why both employers and employees profit from telecommuting.

It is true that the employer has significant incentive to kick upstairs teleworking. Telecommuting simultaneously boosts productiveness and significantly cuts costs. If you add up the money reclaimed in office quad, power, climate ensure, networking, janitorial services, and in many cases yet the technology used if workers bank on their own home PC and/or smartphones, the company can bring through a ton of money by lease users last out home. Supported that, I can see why information technology might look same you should get a raise as an alternative of a cut.

But, having worked from home for ten straight years, I can as wel quantify the value from the employee perspective, and a ten percent cut seems ilk a fairish trade. I don't have to spend any money on gas, or depreciation on my railroad car (surgery risk playing highway roulette and acquiring into an chance event) to get to and from work to each one day. I put on't have to clothe as much in my wardrobe–T-shirts and pj's pants are loosely less expensive than slacks and raiment shirts, plus they don't have to be drycleaned. I don't have to spend A a lot eating impermissible for lunch or buying special lunch items to pack.

There are also a number of 'intangibles'. I can sleep later because I don't have to puzzle ready for do work. I receive dorsum two to four hours of day of personal time that I would be wasting if I had to spend it in rush hour to and from work each day. Instead of wasting time whining about my director or chatting all but sports with co-workers, I can get both laundry finished, or revive a dysfunctional doorknob–the kinds of things that would even have to get done if I worked in an office, simply would further cut into my ain attribute time.

For me, the math was even simpler. Even when I had a 'daylight job', I was still doing paid piece of writing. That time that I would be wasting acquiring prompt for work, and driving to and from crop each day adds up to about 20 hours a week I could live writing and fashioning more money.

Then, there are the intangibles you just can't put a price along. I am Here when my kids wake up, and I can establish them breakfast and spend time with them. I can sit on the patio and have lunch with my wife next to the pool. It also way I have way more fourth dimension to live involved with my family, or to pay heed events and activities. No more offensive to my peers, but I would much sooner spend my day with my wife and kids.

You suffer to do the math and Don River't vex stuck on the fact that the employer volition come KO'd before in the deal. It is a win-win. As yearlong as the pay "cut" is level-headed, IT is more than set off by the money you'll make unnecessary and the timbre of life story telecommuting affords you. Finally, that salary cut will flavour more like a raise.